Under the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), specifically regarding security for appearance, if the court is satisfied that a defendant is about to leave the jurisdiction to avoid legal proceedings, it may order the defendant to furnish security for their appearance to ensure they remain available for the court's judgment.

Order XXXVIII of the Code of Civil Procedure provides the legal mechanism for a court to order the arrest of a defendant or the attachment of their property before a final judgment is passed to prevent the frustration of the decree.

The Code of Civil Procedure allows the court to order a plaintiff to provide security for costs if the plaintiff resides outside the jurisdiction and does not own sufficient immovable property within the country. This measure protects the defendant from the risk of being unable to recover legal costs if the suit is dismissed.

Order XXXVIII of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) specifically addresses the legal processes of arrest and attachment before a final judgment is rendered in a civil case. These actions are typically taken in situations where there is a strong likelihood of the defendant fleeing or disposing of assets to avoid satisfying a potential judgment, thus protecting the plaintiff's interests during the trial.

Order XXXVIII of the Civil Procedure Code, which deals with arrest and attachment before judgment, comprises thirteen rules. These rules provide the court with the necessary authority to secure the presence of the defendant or the property in dispute to ensure that any future decree passed by the court remains effective and enforceable.

Order XXXVIII, Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC) provides the court with the power to order a defendant to furnish security for their appearance. This is a precautionary measure to ensure that the defendant remains within the jurisdiction of the court throughout the pendency of the suit, preventing them from absconding to avoid the court's decree.

Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, embodies the doctrine of 'Res Sub Judice'. It mandates that no court shall proceed with the trial of any suit in which the matter in issue is also directly and substantially in issue in a previously instituted suit between the same parties, thereby preventing conflicting judgments and multiplicity of proceedings.

Res sub judice refers to a matter that is currently under judicial consideration. In the context of civil procedure, the doctrine of stay of suit (Section 10 of the CPC) prevents a court from proceeding with the trial of a suit in which the matter in issue is also directly and substantially in issue in a previously instituted suit between the same parties. The later suit is stayed to prevent conflicting decisions.

Section 10 of the CPC, known as the doctrine of Res Sub Judice, requires four main ingredients to be satisfied: the matter in issue must be directly and substantially the same, the parties must be the same, the previously instituted suit must be pending in a court of competent jurisdiction, and the court must be able to grant the relief claimed.

Section 10 of the Civil Procedure Code (C.P.C.) codifies the doctrine of Res Sub Judice. This principle mandates that a court shall not proceed with the trial of any suit in which the matter in issue is also directly and substantially in issue in a previously instituted suit between the same parties pending in the same or any other court of competent jurisdiction.