According to Section 96(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, no appeal shall lie from a decree passed by the court with the consent of the parties. This is based on the principle of estoppel and the finality of settlements; if parties have voluntarily agreed to the terms of a decree, they are generally precluded from challenging that decree in an appellate forum.

Revisional jurisdiction under the Civil Procedure Code is limited to examining the legality, regularity, or propriety of a lower court's order. It is not an appeal, and therefore, the court generally does not re-evaluate questions of fact, focusing instead on whether the lower court acted within its jurisdiction or committed a material irregularity in law.

Order XLI, Rule 13 of the CPC mandates that the Appellate Court must send notice of the appeal to the court from whose decree the appeal is preferred. This ensures the lower court is aware that its decision is under review, allowing for the transmission of the relevant records to the appellate forum for proper adjudication of the case.

Order XLVI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, provides the procedure for a subordinate court to make a reference to the High Court. This occurs when a court is in doubt regarding a question of law or the validity of an act, ordinance, or regulation during a pending suit.

Under Order VIII, Rule 10, if a party fails to present a written statement when required, the court may pronounce judgment against them. Such a judgment is considered a decree and is therefore appealable under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure. This serves as a procedural consequence for non-compliance with court orders regarding the filing of pleadings.

The right of review is recognized as a substantive right because it allows a party to request the same court that passed an order to reconsider its decision based on the discovery of new evidence or an error apparent on the face of the record. Unlike an appeal, which is a continuation of the original suit, a review is a specific statutory remedy that must be expressly granted by law to be exercised by the court.

The principle of natural justice requires that no order should be passed to the prejudice of any party without providing them an opportunity to be heard. Therefore, a review petition cannot be granted without serving notice to the opposite party to ensure due process.

Under the Code of Civil Procedure, if an appellant does not appear when the appeal is called for hearing, the court is empowered to dismiss the appeal for default. While adjournment is possible at the court's discretion, dismissal is the standard procedural consequence for non-appearance.

Under the Code of Civil Procedure, an appellate court possesses broad powers to ensure justice. It can determine a case finally if the record is sufficient, or it may frame new issues and remand the case back to the trial court for further findings if the original trial was incomplete or if specific issues were not properly addressed, ensuring all necessary facts are adjudicated.

A substantive right is one that creates, defines, and regulates rights and duties. The right of review, which allows a court to reconsider its own judgment under specific circumstances, is considered a substantive right because it is granted by statute rather than being an inherent or natural right. It provides a specific legal remedy for correcting errors in judicial decisions.